Wow, it's already Week 9! How many of you out there are finally done with processing results? It's been such a term I can't believe that the September break is nearly upon us.
I happened to chance upon this article in my Facebook feed and I thought it would be interesting to share. In a nutshell, the article profiles 9 families who raised highly successful children and what it took for them to get there. Success here has not been defined as earning a 6-figure salary, but as professional success. Examples include scientists, entrepreneurs but also painters, rappers and writers.
You can read the article here so that you know what I'm talking about: Secrets of Super Siblings
Reading the article did give me some interesting ideas, especially since in Singapore, success as an adult seems joined at the limbs to educational success. If that is the case, then what can these 9 families tell us about what we are doing right and what we need to change?
1. 8 of the 9 families had educators in the family
It was written that these families had at least one member who was a teacher in some way. This does not mean that you should necessarily rush to join teaching to ensure your child's future success. However, it did mean that the families understood the importance of education for their children and also that they gave their children a stimulating childhood. These children later entered school already knowing the fundamentals of reading, writing and 'rithmetic.
I do believe that the majority of Singaporean parents recognize the importance of education, so for us, the first step has already been reached. Judging by the number of pre-primary enrichment classes doing a roaring business, I would also say that many of our middle-class children are also getting a better headstart in school. (Although the prevalence of enrichment classes does also arouse certain concerns in me, but that's a topic for another blog entry)
Other than the enrichment classes, though, we also have to make sure our children receive as much stimulation as they can in their daily lives. My view as an educator is that a weekly library trip is a basic requirement, to build up their literacy and comprehension skills. I also believe children should also be raised in an environment where reading and thinking is encouraged. That means that bringing your child to the library and sitting in a corner playing Candy Crush is not enough to encourage these skills in your child.
I also speak partly from personal experience. My father is an avid reader and I remember weekly library trips where he left me in the children's section while he went to the non-fiction books. Also, we went quite regularly, not just whenever the books happened to be due! I also remember going to book sales and being allowed to fill my basket. So growing up, I never had to study for an English exam to pass with decent grades.
Thus, it's not just that you have to become a teacher to raise successful kids. Rather, you should understand the importance of education and actively encourage this in your children by engaging them in stimulating activities and setting yourself as a role model.
2. Freedom in Childhood
Many of the children in the article were also free from helicopter parenting. They were pretty much left to their own devices to take care of themselves and explore their own interests. One of those interviewed described cycling to the store a mile away with her younger sister when she was 5!
At first read, this seemed a dangerous thing to do, but later it started to make sense. Firstly, understand that the children were all raised with expectations of good grades and behaviour. Secondly, that they were raised in stimulating environments and encouraged to be active thinkers. When you combine these with a staggering amount of freedom, the children learned to be more independent on their own and also to pursue their curiosity as far as it would take them.
This makes me think. Are we necessarily doing our children a favour by protecting them in the way we do? If I was an American parent raising my child in a neighbourhood where guns were carried and drugs were sold on the corner, of course the answer is clear. If I was in comparatively safe Singapore, though, and I lived a block away from the school, why can't my child walk back home on his own? Or even take the bus to go home if I live a couple of bus stops away?
I thought of this because of the increasing rise of the 'strawberry generation'. You may know the usual complaints: They cannot take hardship, they want things to go their way all the time, they want a lot but are not willing to put in the hard work.
Well, maybe this 'strawberry generation' starts with our own parenting. Take a common thing like fetching them from school. We protect them along that route but do we also transmit the message that they cannot be trusted on their own and they cannot handle themselves without another adult present? I may agree that the younger lower primary should be supervised but I raise my eyebrows whenever I see a burly primary 6 student being accompanied by his grandmother, who is carrying his schoolbag for him!
Of course, there will be people who will disagree with me on this. I'm sure given enough time and sharing of this article, there will be people who will point out and even punch out their own holes in my views. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion after all, but at the very least, I do hope that the Time article makes one really think about our children and create some active discussion (ie, no unproductive trolling) about how we should raise our kids, who will be our future leaders, entrepreneurs, writers and parents themselves.
Friday, August 26, 2016
Wednesday, July 06, 2016
Finding focus
Firstly, Selamat Hari Raya to all our Muslim teachers! I hope all of you are having a good day of celebrations with your family and loved ones!
I took home a pack of compositions and I was marking them at my desk earlier. Sad, I know, but such is the life of a teacher, unfortunately. I do my work at home occasionally though, because it's quieter and I have easy access to drinks, snacks and TV should I get tired, oops, hehe.
Importantly though, is that because I'm more relaxed at home, especially on a weekend or holiday, I find myself being able to pay more attention to their work. For example, since I'm marking compositions, I am more able to pick out their mistakes and think of constructive comments to write on their paper.
Then it struck me: Why is it that I'm only able to do this on a public holiday, which is supposedly a day of rest? Why am I not able to even write proper comments during normal workdays?
The answer that came most readily to me was stress. All around my work desk are various reminders of everything I have to do in a limited time. Worksheets I have to mark. Deadlines I have to meet. Parents I have to call. Emails I have to answer. Post-its with To-Do lists written on them. Ironically, while I need these post-its to remind me of what I have to do, it also places an additional layer of subconscious stress. I'm constantly being reminded that I have tons to do. Sometimes, to take a supposed break during marking, I would stop halfway and do some other menial task, like answer a parent's email.
Faced with all the things I have to do, how is it possible to truly focus on your work? Even when I stopped marking for a while, I would be faced with all the glaring reminders to be more productive and accomplish all this before I go home to cook dinner for the family and spend quality time. Is this really possible???
I know there are plenty of people who can thrive like this, who can whizz through their marking, plan next week's lesson plan and still have time to cook 4 dishes for dinner and teach their children their homework. (Oh you people, you make it hard for the rest of us...)
However, it seems research would back me up when I say I'm only human and I can't always keep up with everything. Plenty of articles, including this one by Health.com will attest to the dangers of multitasking. Similarly, even a normal Google search for 'focus on what is important' will give you plenty of reasons on how better focus will lead to better productivity. The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People also asks us to make a distinction between 'urgent and not important' and 'not urgent but important'.
That's probably why I find marking at home on a public holiday easier. More focus and a more leisurely environment allowing me to focus on what is truly important, namely my students' development, rather than their parents' worries or my heads' projects.
I wish I could have this everyday that I was at work, but for one, life doesn't always give us what we want, and two, sometimes we have to make the best for ourselves. Like bringing work home and working in a comfortable study. ;)
If you want to read up on some stuff to improve your focus, I can recommend:
- The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. The chapters on priorities in life and the distinction between urgent and important is one that has really stuck with me. You can read a short preview of the 7 Habits here but I would recommend you read the book for more details.
- Psychologies magazine has a good feature on finding your focus in life and work. I like this magazine because it comes with a monthly feature that has good tips on improving your life. I think you can still find the issue on Focus at Kinokuniya bookstores. You can check out their content at their website here.
I took home a pack of compositions and I was marking them at my desk earlier. Sad, I know, but such is the life of a teacher, unfortunately. I do my work at home occasionally though, because it's quieter and I have easy access to drinks, snacks and TV should I get tired, oops, hehe.
Importantly though, is that because I'm more relaxed at home, especially on a weekend or holiday, I find myself being able to pay more attention to their work. For example, since I'm marking compositions, I am more able to pick out their mistakes and think of constructive comments to write on their paper.
Then it struck me: Why is it that I'm only able to do this on a public holiday, which is supposedly a day of rest? Why am I not able to even write proper comments during normal workdays?
The answer that came most readily to me was stress. All around my work desk are various reminders of everything I have to do in a limited time. Worksheets I have to mark. Deadlines I have to meet. Parents I have to call. Emails I have to answer. Post-its with To-Do lists written on them. Ironically, while I need these post-its to remind me of what I have to do, it also places an additional layer of subconscious stress. I'm constantly being reminded that I have tons to do. Sometimes, to take a supposed break during marking, I would stop halfway and do some other menial task, like answer a parent's email.
Faced with all the things I have to do, how is it possible to truly focus on your work? Even when I stopped marking for a while, I would be faced with all the glaring reminders to be more productive and accomplish all this before I go home to cook dinner for the family and spend quality time. Is this really possible???
I know there are plenty of people who can thrive like this, who can whizz through their marking, plan next week's lesson plan and still have time to cook 4 dishes for dinner and teach their children their homework. (Oh you people, you make it hard for the rest of us...)
However, it seems research would back me up when I say I'm only human and I can't always keep up with everything. Plenty of articles, including this one by Health.com will attest to the dangers of multitasking. Similarly, even a normal Google search for 'focus on what is important' will give you plenty of reasons on how better focus will lead to better productivity. The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People also asks us to make a distinction between 'urgent and not important' and 'not urgent but important'.
That's probably why I find marking at home on a public holiday easier. More focus and a more leisurely environment allowing me to focus on what is truly important, namely my students' development, rather than their parents' worries or my heads' projects.
I wish I could have this everyday that I was at work, but for one, life doesn't always give us what we want, and two, sometimes we have to make the best for ourselves. Like bringing work home and working in a comfortable study. ;)
If you want to read up on some stuff to improve your focus, I can recommend:
- The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. The chapters on priorities in life and the distinction between urgent and important is one that has really stuck with me. You can read a short preview of the 7 Habits here but I would recommend you read the book for more details.
- Psychologies magazine has a good feature on finding your focus in life and work. I like this magazine because it comes with a monthly feature that has good tips on improving your life. I think you can still find the issue on Focus at Kinokuniya bookstores. You can check out their content at their website here.
Thursday, June 23, 2016
D-Day: Day 1 of School Reopening
It's nearly time for all of us to head back to school and face the students, oh no!! Some of you may have gone back to school for meetings already, some may be heading back tomorrow. Whichever group you belong to, rest well and sleep well on Sunday night! We all know how chaotic the first day of school can be so take it easy that day and don't fret too much about getting your students to finish their homework. There's plenty of time to fret from Day 2 onwards!
Does it ever get easier to readjust back after a long break? I think yes, it does. In my first few years of teaching, it was an absolute pain. Imagine sleeping late for a month and then having to wake up again at 6am. No wonder I dreaded the first day so much! Then after that I got savvier and I learnt a few things about readjustment. Try them!
Wake up earlier on the days just before school starts.
So you've been waking up at noon or later during the June holidays. On this weekend, therefore, wake up at 7, or 6 if you can, on Saturday and Sunday. Don't hit the snooze button and just push yourself out of bed. Resist the temptation to fall back on your sheets after using the bathroom and just do something light in the morning. You could go out for breakfast at the coffeeshop, read the newspapers or watch some TV. The point is to get your body used to waking up early before Day 1.
Do light work on Day 1. Or no work at all.
You might have to collect homework and report books from your students and you will already have marking to do in the afternoon. If you are even more unlucky, your heads may call a meeting after school. Take it easy on yourself and spare the kids as well. You can go through classroom routines or class rules, or have the kids decorate the class by designing inspirational posters or their goals for the exams. This could make the transition easier on everyone all around.
Go. Home.
After school, there will always be things to do, homework to mark, assignments to finish. If you are still suffering from forcing yourself awake at 6 and you feel baggy-eyed, do yourself a favour and go home to have a good nap. A lot of us always think that we have to finish our marking every day and that it's an honourable thing to stay up late to do so. Would you encourage your students to do the same thing? Wouldn't you tell them not to do so because a healthy person needs 8 hours of sleep? So give yourself permission on Day 1 to have a good nap. You will need it to keep yourself going for the rest of the term.
But if you have the energy still...
Go out!
Meet your friends or your family and treat yourself to a good dinner! Tell them all about what a disaster Day 1 was and have a good laugh in retrospect!
What are you planning for Day 1?
Does it ever get easier to readjust back after a long break? I think yes, it does. In my first few years of teaching, it was an absolute pain. Imagine sleeping late for a month and then having to wake up again at 6am. No wonder I dreaded the first day so much! Then after that I got savvier and I learnt a few things about readjustment. Try them!
Wake up earlier on the days just before school starts.
So you've been waking up at noon or later during the June holidays. On this weekend, therefore, wake up at 7, or 6 if you can, on Saturday and Sunday. Don't hit the snooze button and just push yourself out of bed. Resist the temptation to fall back on your sheets after using the bathroom and just do something light in the morning. You could go out for breakfast at the coffeeshop, read the newspapers or watch some TV. The point is to get your body used to waking up early before Day 1.
Do light work on Day 1. Or no work at all.
You might have to collect homework and report books from your students and you will already have marking to do in the afternoon. If you are even more unlucky, your heads may call a meeting after school. Take it easy on yourself and spare the kids as well. You can go through classroom routines or class rules, or have the kids decorate the class by designing inspirational posters or their goals for the exams. This could make the transition easier on everyone all around.
Go. Home.
After school, there will always be things to do, homework to mark, assignments to finish. If you are still suffering from forcing yourself awake at 6 and you feel baggy-eyed, do yourself a favour and go home to have a good nap. A lot of us always think that we have to finish our marking every day and that it's an honourable thing to stay up late to do so. Would you encourage your students to do the same thing? Wouldn't you tell them not to do so because a healthy person needs 8 hours of sleep? So give yourself permission on Day 1 to have a good nap. You will need it to keep yourself going for the rest of the term.
But if you have the energy still...
Go out!
Meet your friends or your family and treat yourself to a good dinner! Tell them all about what a disaster Day 1 was and have a good laugh in retrospect!
What are you planning for Day 1?
Friday, May 13, 2016
Has the System Failed Us?
How is everyone doing? This should be exam-marking time for most of you. If you are neck-deep in papers to be marked and panicking over the worksheets to be returned, hang in there! It will all be over in 2 weeks!
The following comic came up in my Facebook feed today which made me think of our exam system, I wonder if any of you have seen this:
If you switch the tree with the PSLE exam, I suppose that makes the monkey the middle progress (MP) student, the bird the higher progress (HP) and the rest lower progress (LP). It might even put the seal and the penguin in the Learning Support Programme (LSP) and the elephant in the School-based Dyslexia Remediation programme (SDR).
I know there will be some people who will protest that I'm making a mockery out of the LSP and SDR programmes and the students enrolled in these programmes really do benefit from them. However, that is not the point. Yes, there are weak readers and dyslexic students who really need the LSP and SDR programmes. They do improve with the additional guidance and it can make a difference in their academic performance.
This is the point I'm trying to make: That we have these programmes to help them succeed in OUR SYSTEM, not necessarily always to help them find their own.
Consider this, that ever since the PSLE system was first formed, it has continued to assess in the same medium, that of a written paper. It is fully impartial, like that of blind Justice. It sets out a set of standards and expectations, and it weighs its candidates according to those.
This is one of its strengths, but it also leads to its weaknesses.
It does not, for example, acknowledge PROGRESS. It does not see that a student may have strenuously struggled with the Chinese language for 6 years and finally passed for the first time in the exam. It only sees a C.
It does not acknowledge SOCIALIZATION SKILLS. It does not acknowledge what we know as the 'people skills'. This may include the ability to lead, to motivate a team to a common goal, the ability to work in a team etc. Ironically, these traits may even be stronger factors of a person's success in the corporate world than their PSLE or O level grades.
It does not acknowledge CREATIVITY, from the wide-ranging vision of a CEO who may scout out new directions for a company right down to the practising artist who thinks of new ways of creating art.
I write this because I have seen the system fail some of my past students in these ways. I saw kids who couldn't read a word in Primary 1 finally write out 80 words in a (somewhat) coherent composition in Primary 2, who would fail because the composition had too many grammatical mistakes to make the passing grade. I also saw kids who would work hard every night on their own with minimal parental supervision have their efforts rewarded with a barely-passing mark above 50. Of course, I also saw kids who were masters of leadership, who did badly in their exams and yet could plot and instigate other kids to do their bidding. (For the sake of the country, I hope they used their leadership powers for good in the end.)
Whenever some of the above situations occur, the system impartially puts a failing grade on them. And for all the changes in the PSLE system since the very first paper, it remains the same. That is, of a written paper which tests reading, writing, listening and analytical skills (in the case of Math and Science). If the system cannot assess, monitor or reward our kids in the 3 areas I mentioned above, then instead of having it fail our kids, we should say IT HAS FAILED us.
As of now, I cannot decide where the blame lies. Do we blame the system, for only rewarding the A students who were lucky enough to be born with brains and those born with the money to go for tuition and enrichment? Do we blame society, for catering to the system and demanding higher levels of accountability? For letting the system stay in place without higher demands for change at a more profound level?
*Sigh* Such big questions just because I've been marking some English papers. I'm not sure anyone can answer them easily in my lifetime but maybe, if some people read this, think about it and start changing mindsets, I'd be satisfied enough. For now, enough with the big questions, away from the keyboard and back to the red pen...
What do you think? Do you agree about the system or not? Why do you do so? Please leave your thoughts in the comments! (Trolls will be sent out of class)
The following comic came up in my Facebook feed today which made me think of our exam system, I wonder if any of you have seen this:
I know there will be some people who will protest that I'm making a mockery out of the LSP and SDR programmes and the students enrolled in these programmes really do benefit from them. However, that is not the point. Yes, there are weak readers and dyslexic students who really need the LSP and SDR programmes. They do improve with the additional guidance and it can make a difference in their academic performance.
This is the point I'm trying to make: That we have these programmes to help them succeed in OUR SYSTEM, not necessarily always to help them find their own.
Consider this, that ever since the PSLE system was first formed, it has continued to assess in the same medium, that of a written paper. It is fully impartial, like that of blind Justice. It sets out a set of standards and expectations, and it weighs its candidates according to those.
This is one of its strengths, but it also leads to its weaknesses.
It does not, for example, acknowledge PROGRESS. It does not see that a student may have strenuously struggled with the Chinese language for 6 years and finally passed for the first time in the exam. It only sees a C.
It does not acknowledge SOCIALIZATION SKILLS. It does not acknowledge what we know as the 'people skills'. This may include the ability to lead, to motivate a team to a common goal, the ability to work in a team etc. Ironically, these traits may even be stronger factors of a person's success in the corporate world than their PSLE or O level grades.
It does not acknowledge CREATIVITY, from the wide-ranging vision of a CEO who may scout out new directions for a company right down to the practising artist who thinks of new ways of creating art.
I write this because I have seen the system fail some of my past students in these ways. I saw kids who couldn't read a word in Primary 1 finally write out 80 words in a (somewhat) coherent composition in Primary 2, who would fail because the composition had too many grammatical mistakes to make the passing grade. I also saw kids who would work hard every night on their own with minimal parental supervision have their efforts rewarded with a barely-passing mark above 50. Of course, I also saw kids who were masters of leadership, who did badly in their exams and yet could plot and instigate other kids to do their bidding. (For the sake of the country, I hope they used their leadership powers for good in the end.)
Whenever some of the above situations occur, the system impartially puts a failing grade on them. And for all the changes in the PSLE system since the very first paper, it remains the same. That is, of a written paper which tests reading, writing, listening and analytical skills (in the case of Math and Science). If the system cannot assess, monitor or reward our kids in the 3 areas I mentioned above, then instead of having it fail our kids, we should say IT HAS FAILED us.
As of now, I cannot decide where the blame lies. Do we blame the system, for only rewarding the A students who were lucky enough to be born with brains and those born with the money to go for tuition and enrichment? Do we blame society, for catering to the system and demanding higher levels of accountability? For letting the system stay in place without higher demands for change at a more profound level?
*Sigh* Such big questions just because I've been marking some English papers. I'm not sure anyone can answer them easily in my lifetime but maybe, if some people read this, think about it and start changing mindsets, I'd be satisfied enough. For now, enough with the big questions, away from the keyboard and back to the red pen...
What do you think? Do you agree about the system or not? Why do you do so? Please leave your thoughts in the comments! (Trolls will be sent out of class)
Thursday, May 12, 2016
Just do the corrections
Recently, I was talking about the good old days with a friend. She reminded of something I had forgotten and as we talked further, I felt the emotions from long ago rise up again.
Slightly more than 10 years ago, I went for my interview at MOE HQ. I hadn't thought about it much since then, but my friend reminded me how devastated I was after that. "Do you remember," she chuckled, "That you were so sure that you wouldn't be chosen and that you would be unemployed for the rest of your life?"
Then I started to remember. I remembered how all my prepared answers flew out the window as the panel of interviewers shot questions in rapid-fire. I remembered how totally unimpressive my answers were and that I was sure I had screwed it up somehow.
I was pretty upset after the interview, to be sure. I had been unemployed for about a year and I had been giving tuition to support myself. The MOE interview was one of the last bets I had to secure a decent-paying job. I didn't manage to say any of the answers I had rehearsed with my friend and after the interview, I sat with her at McDonald's wailing over a cup of coke, lost about my future and whether I would ever get a full time job.
When I remembered that, other memories then surfaced. I also remembered the first class I ever had as a BT, how I couldn't handle the problem students and how I felt imprisoned because of the bond. All the optimism I felt at NIE was gone and I felt helpless. I couldn't handle the students, I couldn't leave because of the bond and all the other BTs seemed to be doing fine or even better than me.
I wondered whether to leave after my bond.
The years passed again. I remembered a particularly bad observation. The kind that was so bad, I had to have another observation, which was even worse. The kind where the students didn't listen, didn't do the work properly, where I became even more panicked because they were getting out of hand and the fact that my RO was there frowning in the corner made me even more panicked and of course, things rapidly spiralled out of hand.
Of course, the evaluation I received at the end of that, suffice to say, was not excellent. I didn't want to face my colleagues in the staff room, who would ask me how it went. I just sat alone in the classroom after dismissing the kids for recess, wondering if I was ever cut out for this job and maybe it was all one big horrendous mistake. Even now, thinking about it makes my heart sting, despite all the years that have passed since then.
The funny thing is, it's been 10 years and I'm still here. I've been saying that to myself a lot because to me, it's such a miracle that all these screw-ups happened to me and yet, I'm still here. I've seen people cleverer and more capable than I was leave the service. I've seen others lapse into depression after getting the same bad evaluations that I did. I've also seen less capable people stay on due to well-played politics.
And of course, I've seen classes of children, good and bad, come, study and graduate.
Maybe reaching that 10-year mark was something of a tipping point for me. After reaching this point and experiencing some of the lows that I did, I realised that there was nothing really that could faze me, except myself. Despite all the bad and really terrible times I went through, I still made it, plodding along, slowly but surely. I created a sort of mantra for myself. If it doesn't get it killed or fired, then I would be fine. I would be upset, surely, but I would learn and get through, because I had already gone through so much other worse stuff.
Perhaps that is the advantage that the class failure has. The lesson that if you can get through failure, you learn better how to survive it and thrive from it.
Today, I screwed up again at work, though thankfully on a more minor matter. I felt the same upset feeling again, but this time, compared to the past others, was slightly different. This time, there was also a little voice telling me,
Just do the corrections.
I had to laugh. It was my own voice, the same voice that I told the kids again and again in class. Maybe reminding me of the same encouragement that I would give to any kid struggling with the times table or even to add 2 and 2. The voice I used to tell the kids not to give up on your mistakes, to do the corrections for it and learn from it. Mistakes are ok. If you don't get it now, as long as you try again, you'd get it eventually, and I know you'd get it if you just keep trying.
So to anyone struggling in their career, having a bad time with the kids or even a worse time with the adults, to anyone who's felt that they would never ever finish the marking, who's felt that they would never get through to the kids,
Or to anyone who's ever felt that you're a failure as a teacher and that you'll never make it.
You're not bad, you're not stupid and you're not a failure as a teacher.
Hang in there, do the corrections, learn from your mistakes. You will get there in the end.
Take this lesson, not from the successes around you, but from the account of one who's already failed before and who's still around.
And you know what? One day, you will reach the 10, 20 or even 30 year mark. Maybe, like me, you will also look back and wonder that you made it through after all.
Slightly more than 10 years ago, I went for my interview at MOE HQ. I hadn't thought about it much since then, but my friend reminded me how devastated I was after that. "Do you remember," she chuckled, "That you were so sure that you wouldn't be chosen and that you would be unemployed for the rest of your life?"
Then I started to remember. I remembered how all my prepared answers flew out the window as the panel of interviewers shot questions in rapid-fire. I remembered how totally unimpressive my answers were and that I was sure I had screwed it up somehow.
I was pretty upset after the interview, to be sure. I had been unemployed for about a year and I had been giving tuition to support myself. The MOE interview was one of the last bets I had to secure a decent-paying job. I didn't manage to say any of the answers I had rehearsed with my friend and after the interview, I sat with her at McDonald's wailing over a cup of coke, lost about my future and whether I would ever get a full time job.
When I remembered that, other memories then surfaced. I also remembered the first class I ever had as a BT, how I couldn't handle the problem students and how I felt imprisoned because of the bond. All the optimism I felt at NIE was gone and I felt helpless. I couldn't handle the students, I couldn't leave because of the bond and all the other BTs seemed to be doing fine or even better than me.
I wondered whether to leave after my bond.
The years passed again. I remembered a particularly bad observation. The kind that was so bad, I had to have another observation, which was even worse. The kind where the students didn't listen, didn't do the work properly, where I became even more panicked because they were getting out of hand and the fact that my RO was there frowning in the corner made me even more panicked and of course, things rapidly spiralled out of hand.
Of course, the evaluation I received at the end of that, suffice to say, was not excellent. I didn't want to face my colleagues in the staff room, who would ask me how it went. I just sat alone in the classroom after dismissing the kids for recess, wondering if I was ever cut out for this job and maybe it was all one big horrendous mistake. Even now, thinking about it makes my heart sting, despite all the years that have passed since then.
The funny thing is, it's been 10 years and I'm still here. I've been saying that to myself a lot because to me, it's such a miracle that all these screw-ups happened to me and yet, I'm still here. I've seen people cleverer and more capable than I was leave the service. I've seen others lapse into depression after getting the same bad evaluations that I did. I've also seen less capable people stay on due to well-played politics.
And of course, I've seen classes of children, good and bad, come, study and graduate.
Maybe reaching that 10-year mark was something of a tipping point for me. After reaching this point and experiencing some of the lows that I did, I realised that there was nothing really that could faze me, except myself. Despite all the bad and really terrible times I went through, I still made it, plodding along, slowly but surely. I created a sort of mantra for myself. If it doesn't get it killed or fired, then I would be fine. I would be upset, surely, but I would learn and get through, because I had already gone through so much other worse stuff.
Perhaps that is the advantage that the class failure has. The lesson that if you can get through failure, you learn better how to survive it and thrive from it.
Today, I screwed up again at work, though thankfully on a more minor matter. I felt the same upset feeling again, but this time, compared to the past others, was slightly different. This time, there was also a little voice telling me,
Just do the corrections.
I had to laugh. It was my own voice, the same voice that I told the kids again and again in class. Maybe reminding me of the same encouragement that I would give to any kid struggling with the times table or even to add 2 and 2. The voice I used to tell the kids not to give up on your mistakes, to do the corrections for it and learn from it. Mistakes are ok. If you don't get it now, as long as you try again, you'd get it eventually, and I know you'd get it if you just keep trying.
So to anyone struggling in their career, having a bad time with the kids or even a worse time with the adults, to anyone who's felt that they would never ever finish the marking, who's felt that they would never get through to the kids,
Or to anyone who's ever felt that you're a failure as a teacher and that you'll never make it.
You're not bad, you're not stupid and you're not a failure as a teacher.
Hang in there, do the corrections, learn from your mistakes. You will get there in the end.
Take this lesson, not from the successes around you, but from the account of one who's already failed before and who's still around.
And you know what? One day, you will reach the 10, 20 or even 30 year mark. Maybe, like me, you will also look back and wonder that you made it through after all.
Monday, April 25, 2016
Models... Not the super kind...
Sometimes, a bout of marking will give me ideas on what to write on. This time round, the math worksheets have given me some ideas about models.
Models - One of the mainstays of our Singaporean Mathematics learning system. This method has been around for a long time and yes, even I remember learning them when I was a student myself! A quick search on Wikipedia reveals that this came about in our syllabus in the early 1980s so I suppose that makes my cohort one of the pioneers who learnt this system! (If you don't know what the model method is all about, here is a link to help.)
I do concede that my students who draw models during tests do better. However, marking their worksheets and thinking about the way schools in Singapore have carried this out has made me wonder: Are we putting too much emphasis on the model method, in the wrong way? I know my school isn't the first to have the students draw bars and bars of models in their work, sometimes even writing up whole worksheets dedicated to the drawing of accurate models. I know I'm not the first teacher to underline and redraw their students' models and sometimes, giving up altogether and making them erase everything to start again.
However, I want to say that by doing so, we have to be clear on our reasons for doing so.
First, let us consider what the model is. For this purpose, I found a video by Dr Yeap Ban Har very useful. This video shows him giving a talk on 'Singapore Math' in UK and here he explains what the model is:
(PS: I studied the teaching of Math under Dr Yeap in NIE and I found him one of the most entertaining and passionate Math lecturers there. If you ever find a course conducted by him, I strongly suggest you attend.)
So now I know that they are really a tool, or in his words, "a mere excuse... to develop visualization ability" and to provide a stepping stone to the algebra they will eventually encounter.
Which also makes me wonder why on earth some schools would force their students to draw models for every single problem sum, even deducting marks for models drawn wrongly even if the equations are correct. Isn't that like checking to see if you were counting on your fingers in the way that they want? Yes, it is an important tool for understanding but at the same time, there are other problem solving methods out there. Just as some kids would understand better through model drawing, there are also kids that understand just as well without the models. (Or worse, be led into misunderstanding the problem because of the model being drawn wrongly)
Another issue is the accuracy needed in drawing a model. Other than the lines having to be straight, the units have to follow mathematical logic as well. For example, if Robert has 3 times as many units as Stella, you cannot draw a model where Robert's 3 units are equal in length to Stella's 1 unit. This may lead students into developing a flawed understanding.
Yet I'm sceptical about making my students draw and erase until they draw perfect mathematical models. Remember that the syllabus is about developing problem-solving skills, not about mathematical drawing skills. Do we really have to make them draw all their models from scratch? Can we not, for example, provide blank rectangles for them to start the thinking process and then add on their own model drawings?
So as a summing up:
- Models are a method for teaching, amongst many others
- We teach them so that the students can visualize problems better (and there's a fine difference between problems and problem sums, I feel, but that's another topic for another day)
- We are not teaching them so that our students will be accurate artists
- Maybe there are other ways to let them use the model method, without making them draw everything from scratch
- Maybe we can also teach them, they have a choice to use it or not
Anyway, if you have become intrigued by Dr Yeap, here is another video where he talks about Singapore Math.
What do you think about the Model Method? Comment below!
Models - One of the mainstays of our Singaporean Mathematics learning system. This method has been around for a long time and yes, even I remember learning them when I was a student myself! A quick search on Wikipedia reveals that this came about in our syllabus in the early 1980s so I suppose that makes my cohort one of the pioneers who learnt this system! (If you don't know what the model method is all about, here is a link to help.)
I do concede that my students who draw models during tests do better. However, marking their worksheets and thinking about the way schools in Singapore have carried this out has made me wonder: Are we putting too much emphasis on the model method, in the wrong way? I know my school isn't the first to have the students draw bars and bars of models in their work, sometimes even writing up whole worksheets dedicated to the drawing of accurate models. I know I'm not the first teacher to underline and redraw their students' models and sometimes, giving up altogether and making them erase everything to start again.
However, I want to say that by doing so, we have to be clear on our reasons for doing so.
First, let us consider what the model is. For this purpose, I found a video by Dr Yeap Ban Har very useful. This video shows him giving a talk on 'Singapore Math' in UK and here he explains what the model is:
So now I know that they are really a tool, or in his words, "a mere excuse... to develop visualization ability" and to provide a stepping stone to the algebra they will eventually encounter.
Which also makes me wonder why on earth some schools would force their students to draw models for every single problem sum, even deducting marks for models drawn wrongly even if the equations are correct. Isn't that like checking to see if you were counting on your fingers in the way that they want? Yes, it is an important tool for understanding but at the same time, there are other problem solving methods out there. Just as some kids would understand better through model drawing, there are also kids that understand just as well without the models. (Or worse, be led into misunderstanding the problem because of the model being drawn wrongly)
Another issue is the accuracy needed in drawing a model. Other than the lines having to be straight, the units have to follow mathematical logic as well. For example, if Robert has 3 times as many units as Stella, you cannot draw a model where Robert's 3 units are equal in length to Stella's 1 unit. This may lead students into developing a flawed understanding.
Yet I'm sceptical about making my students draw and erase until they draw perfect mathematical models. Remember that the syllabus is about developing problem-solving skills, not about mathematical drawing skills. Do we really have to make them draw all their models from scratch? Can we not, for example, provide blank rectangles for them to start the thinking process and then add on their own model drawings?
So as a summing up:
- Models are a method for teaching, amongst many others
- We teach them so that the students can visualize problems better (and there's a fine difference between problems and problem sums, I feel, but that's another topic for another day)
- We are not teaching them so that our students will be accurate artists
- Maybe there are other ways to let them use the model method, without making them draw everything from scratch
- Maybe we can also teach them, they have a choice to use it or not
Anyway, if you have become intrigued by Dr Yeap, here is another video where he talks about Singapore Math.
What do you think about the Model Method? Comment below!
Monday, April 18, 2016
We are Not Happy... Why? The 1-yr-old BT vs the 10-yr-old Old Maid
I've been going through the blog archives looking for inspiration for new blog posts. When I did so, I realised that some of the old entries dated back to my NIE days! Talk about feeling old!
I read through a couple and I felt even older. The voice that was being projected in the blog archives really sounded younger and more energetic. Compare that to now, when the words I type now seem to crawl across the screen. Ah, youth...
One post that caught my eye was this old one: We are Not Happy... Why? At the time, a number of complaints had appeared in the now-defunct Tomorrow.sg website about the things making them unhappy in the industry. I read through the post and wondered: Had things changed enough in the 10 years since I last wrote that post? Let's compare then:
The 1-yr-old BT vs The 10-yr-old Old Maid
BT:
" it is NOT the children that is causing the dissatisfaction, but all other things like the leadership, the administration, the non-curriculuar activities."
Old Maid:
10 years on, I don't think this has changed at all! I still find satisfaction in coming to the classroom. However, I still feel like the administrative duties are an interference to my real work with the students. In fact, with experience came added responsibilities that I had to quickly learn how to adapt to. I handled them with mixed results, some I felt turned out all right in the end, some I could not handle well and became disasters bigger than what they began with!
The general feeling I get from other teachers regarding admin work and leadership seems to be the same: Something that came along with the job and that had to be tolerated. People that weren't keen on tolerating them just dropped out and became tuition teachers or left the industry altogether.
What I found frustrating was when all this affected the teaching work. At such times, I was teaching very boring lessons because I didn't have the time to plan my lessons properly. It became easier with time, because I started to collect classroom activities and created some of my own as well. As time went by, I became more familiar with the syllabus and the activities for each topic. So what was said to me as a BT really came true: It really does get easier.
My advice and viewpoint on this: Unfortunately, NIE doesn't train productivity, time management and people skills. Pick them up on your own and spend some precious time reading up and finding a system that works for you because you will need it more the longer you are in teaching. Always spend time brushing up on what you know of the syllabus and any teaching strategies.
BT:
"I feel as if we are expected everyday to do more and more and more for the children, but only for that few extra peanuts. [and not gold-plated ones, to boot]"
Old Maid:
To really see if we are doing more and more for the children, you have to know the changes that have taken place in the system since then.
First, by now all should know that hiring has frozen, especially if you notice the lack of Mrs-Chong-esque TV advertisements. Next, you should also be aware of the grand change in the English syllabus known as Stellar and Peri, otherwise the next paragraph won't make sense to you. Maths has also seen some topics being dropped out though I also see more emphasis on higher order problem solving.
I feel that if you only look at the number of worksheets issued under Stellar and the topics dropped from Maths, you may feel that there's not that much work to do. However, I do feel that more actual teaching is expected. Forget teach-less-learn-more, it seems to be teach-more-learn-more, with holistic assessments all thrown into the mix. The good of all this is that the system has become more student-centric and is a lot more forgiving of each individual child's unique mix of strengths, talents and weaknesses. This is a long way from the system that I grew up under.
Something that has not changed though, I'm still waiting for my gold-plated peanuts, haha. Although the Connect plan comes very close to this, the 3 years waiting for it can sometimes be quite a pain, I admit.
BT:
"I hope our suffering is not caused by our own silence. There is only so much that we can all take to a certain point. Why allow others to put you past that point?"
Old Maid:
Some teachers obviously found dingy solutions to their own suffering, as evidenced by the number of sex-abuse cases that have come up in the news, more and more in recent times. [Thankfully, they make up a small number of the total teacher population]
Social media has changed the game in this arena. We share more stories of what we go through online on Facebook or Twitter (or Blogger!) The more these stories get shared, the more the public has become more aware of what we go through in order to educate our children. I get a lot of sympathy from other people when I tell them I'm a teacher! They usually tell me, "Teachers do a lot, don't they?" Yes, everyone, they do.
And this helps, because then a lot more people become more willing to speak up for us when we feel like we cannot. Take what happened when the news came out that they were willing to charge teachers for using the school carparks. I read through the comments section and was touched to see members of the public expressing outrage at such a move.
As the movie said, though, "with great power comes great responsibility". Now that we have more outlets to express ourselves, another responsibility also falls on us to use that power wisely. The Internet is a great place for FB-scrolling and looking for cute gifs of cats, yes, but it can do that much more for us by giving us a place to speak up. We are no longer just limited to those outlets blessed by MOE, but we can create soapboxes of our own from which to speak from.
However, if we cannot express ourselves well, if all we do is complain in bad English, make fun of our heads or students, then no one will ever take us seriously when we have something serious to complain about. I would tell my BT-self of the past that yes, things will change in the future. We can break out of our own silence, but you will find that by doing so, you have an even greater onus to research your facts, gather your information before speaking up with a viewpoint.
Conclusion......?
BT: "So by now I guess I'll be in this line a very long time. Is it going to be worth the ride?"
Old Maid: "Put it this way: You will go through a lot of pain. You will struggle through some really bad days and you might even cry on some of them in your cubicle when no one is around. There will be days when you feel like crying in class, there will be days you feel like you will never be a good teacher, there will be days when you feel like you will never finish all the paperwork. There will be days your head will yell at you for the things you didn't know you had to do. There will be days you will feel like you see no end.
But on some days, you will make the children smile and laugh. You will sit next to a crying child and comfort him/her till they feel they can go on with school again. You will have hilarious times in class and if you are really lucky, you will that child who couldn't spell his name correctly in P1 walk up on stage in P6 and you will swell with pride even if you hadn't taught him for the last 4 years.
If you feel that those are worth more than all the other stuff, then you just might make it."
I read through a couple and I felt even older. The voice that was being projected in the blog archives really sounded younger and more energetic. Compare that to now, when the words I type now seem to crawl across the screen. Ah, youth...
One post that caught my eye was this old one: We are Not Happy... Why? At the time, a number of complaints had appeared in the now-defunct Tomorrow.sg website about the things making them unhappy in the industry. I read through the post and wondered: Had things changed enough in the 10 years since I last wrote that post? Let's compare then:
The 1-yr-old BT vs The 10-yr-old Old Maid
BT:
" it is NOT the children that is causing the dissatisfaction, but all other things like the leadership, the administration, the non-curriculuar activities."
Old Maid:
10 years on, I don't think this has changed at all! I still find satisfaction in coming to the classroom. However, I still feel like the administrative duties are an interference to my real work with the students. In fact, with experience came added responsibilities that I had to quickly learn how to adapt to. I handled them with mixed results, some I felt turned out all right in the end, some I could not handle well and became disasters bigger than what they began with!
The general feeling I get from other teachers regarding admin work and leadership seems to be the same: Something that came along with the job and that had to be tolerated. People that weren't keen on tolerating them just dropped out and became tuition teachers or left the industry altogether.
What I found frustrating was when all this affected the teaching work. At such times, I was teaching very boring lessons because I didn't have the time to plan my lessons properly. It became easier with time, because I started to collect classroom activities and created some of my own as well. As time went by, I became more familiar with the syllabus and the activities for each topic. So what was said to me as a BT really came true: It really does get easier.
My advice and viewpoint on this: Unfortunately, NIE doesn't train productivity, time management and people skills. Pick them up on your own and spend some precious time reading up and finding a system that works for you because you will need it more the longer you are in teaching. Always spend time brushing up on what you know of the syllabus and any teaching strategies.
BT:
"I feel as if we are expected everyday to do more and more and more for the children, but only for that few extra peanuts. [and not gold-plated ones, to boot]"
Old Maid:
To really see if we are doing more and more for the children, you have to know the changes that have taken place in the system since then.
First, by now all should know that hiring has frozen, especially if you notice the lack of Mrs-Chong-esque TV advertisements. Next, you should also be aware of the grand change in the English syllabus known as Stellar and Peri, otherwise the next paragraph won't make sense to you. Maths has also seen some topics being dropped out though I also see more emphasis on higher order problem solving.
I feel that if you only look at the number of worksheets issued under Stellar and the topics dropped from Maths, you may feel that there's not that much work to do. However, I do feel that more actual teaching is expected. Forget teach-less-learn-more, it seems to be teach-more-learn-more, with holistic assessments all thrown into the mix. The good of all this is that the system has become more student-centric and is a lot more forgiving of each individual child's unique mix of strengths, talents and weaknesses. This is a long way from the system that I grew up under.
Something that has not changed though, I'm still waiting for my gold-plated peanuts, haha. Although the Connect plan comes very close to this, the 3 years waiting for it can sometimes be quite a pain, I admit.
BT:
"I hope our suffering is not caused by our own silence. There is only so much that we can all take to a certain point. Why allow others to put you past that point?"
Old Maid:
Some teachers obviously found dingy solutions to their own suffering, as evidenced by the number of sex-abuse cases that have come up in the news, more and more in recent times. [Thankfully, they make up a small number of the total teacher population]
Social media has changed the game in this arena. We share more stories of what we go through online on Facebook or Twitter (or Blogger!) The more these stories get shared, the more the public has become more aware of what we go through in order to educate our children. I get a lot of sympathy from other people when I tell them I'm a teacher! They usually tell me, "Teachers do a lot, don't they?" Yes, everyone, they do.
And this helps, because then a lot more people become more willing to speak up for us when we feel like we cannot. Take what happened when the news came out that they were willing to charge teachers for using the school carparks. I read through the comments section and was touched to see members of the public expressing outrage at such a move.
As the movie said, though, "with great power comes great responsibility". Now that we have more outlets to express ourselves, another responsibility also falls on us to use that power wisely. The Internet is a great place for FB-scrolling and looking for cute gifs of cats, yes, but it can do that much more for us by giving us a place to speak up. We are no longer just limited to those outlets blessed by MOE, but we can create soapboxes of our own from which to speak from.
However, if we cannot express ourselves well, if all we do is complain in bad English, make fun of our heads or students, then no one will ever take us seriously when we have something serious to complain about. I would tell my BT-self of the past that yes, things will change in the future. We can break out of our own silence, but you will find that by doing so, you have an even greater onus to research your facts, gather your information before speaking up with a viewpoint.
Conclusion......?
BT: "So by now I guess I'll be in this line a very long time. Is it going to be worth the ride?"
Old Maid: "Put it this way: You will go through a lot of pain. You will struggle through some really bad days and you might even cry on some of them in your cubicle when no one is around. There will be days when you feel like crying in class, there will be days you feel like you will never be a good teacher, there will be days when you feel like you will never finish all the paperwork. There will be days your head will yell at you for the things you didn't know you had to do. There will be days you will feel like you see no end.
But on some days, you will make the children smile and laugh. You will sit next to a crying child and comfort him/her till they feel they can go on with school again. You will have hilarious times in class and if you are really lucky, you will that child who couldn't spell his name correctly in P1 walk up on stage in P6 and you will swell with pride even if you hadn't taught him for the last 4 years.
If you feel that those are worth more than all the other stuff, then you just might make it."
A Rough Guide To Writing Exam Papers
One of the most difficult things for me in this job is setting exam papers. Over the years, I feel like I've set enough papers to write assessment books for each level! Admittedly, setting papers is not my strong point and unfortunately there are no TRAISI courses to teach you how to do this. I learnt how to do them along the way, as part of the job and I picked up a few pointers to help me. Hopefully it helps you too!
1. Gather your materials - TOS, SOW, old exam papers
The Table of Specifications (TOS) and Scheme of Work (SOW) are vital documents for any exam setter. The first tells you what kinds of questions should be in the exam, for example, how many comprehension questions or grammar cloze questions. You might think that such things would be the same throughout schools in Singapore and the general format might be the same for the upper primary. However, there may be subtle differences. One school may decide to include more higher order math questions than another. The TOS should make this clear.
The SOW is just as important because it tells you what material the students would have covered up till the examination date. Again, this would vary from school to school and supplementary materials may differ. A detailed SOW would also be useful because it would also reflect the learning objectives for each unit. One such SOW for English may list out the vocabulary items and their expected usage. If you refer to the SOW for paper setting, you would not set questions that are out of the syllabus or that have not been covered.
As for old exam papers, they are useful as a question reference but don't think you can simply erase the old questions and replace them with new ones. I made this mistake once when I was setting one for the first time. I forgot to ask for the TOS and instead set the paper according to an old exam paper, only to find out to my horror that the exam format had changed and I had to reset the paper all over again! Don't do the same mistake I did and always ask for a TOS!
2. Start picking at nits
Everything about the paper must be up to par. Make sure all questions are arranged neatly in line. Check that you used the correct cover page and font. Measure your diagrams to check for mathematical accuracy. You can also print out a copy of your paper to ensure your scientific diagrams can be seen clearly. ( You would be surprised how different they look from your computer screen. ) Remember to update your answer key if you change any questions. Compare your paper with an approved previous exam to see that you have written instructions correctly, or put the check boxes correctly. It is tedious work but if you find it and correct it yourself, someone else won't have to tell you so.
3. Take all criticism in your stride
After you have handed your paper up, the next stressful moment is getting it back. That's when you get it back with all the corrections you have to do by yesterday. Your head should also go over the paper with you to explain the rationale for certain corrections or to clarify her expectations. Maybe the question you thought was a killer turned out to be too easy?
It can be demoralizing the first few times to see so many corrections in a piece of work. Don't sweat it. Most of the time, your head isn't being personal when this is done. Sometimes at the HOD level, they are more aware of the different standards from level to level and they have to adjust whatever work you send in. I always get corrections in my papers and I also see colleagues more experienced than I am get back a paper with tons of corrections too. It's normal for anyone so just take it in your stride and use the experience to learn how a paper should be set.
4. Hide
I would not recommend ever setting your paper in a public setting. You might say that you need your Starbucks frappe to help you do your work, but have you considered that your students, who will be taking your exam, may be drinking at that Starbucks outlet too? Even if you go to the other side of Singapore from where your school is, you never know if you would meet a parent, school or head while you are there. Worse, they might be looking over your shoulder while you type and you might never find out until the truth blows up in everyone's faces. Order that frappe to go and hide in the privacy of your own home to do this piece of work.
Luckily I never learned this lesson the hard way, but I have encountered parents and students while marking in public areas. If I was setting papers instead, I might have gotten into trouble if one student suddenly brags on Facebook about how he really earned his marks.
Hope this short list helps some of you out there. It is not meant to be a gospel of exam setting and I'm pretty sure there are points I might not have thought of or situations that haven't happened to me [yet]. Share with us if you have any other pointers for others!
1. Gather your materials - TOS, SOW, old exam papers
The Table of Specifications (TOS) and Scheme of Work (SOW) are vital documents for any exam setter. The first tells you what kinds of questions should be in the exam, for example, how many comprehension questions or grammar cloze questions. You might think that such things would be the same throughout schools in Singapore and the general format might be the same for the upper primary. However, there may be subtle differences. One school may decide to include more higher order math questions than another. The TOS should make this clear.
The SOW is just as important because it tells you what material the students would have covered up till the examination date. Again, this would vary from school to school and supplementary materials may differ. A detailed SOW would also be useful because it would also reflect the learning objectives for each unit. One such SOW for English may list out the vocabulary items and their expected usage. If you refer to the SOW for paper setting, you would not set questions that are out of the syllabus or that have not been covered.
As for old exam papers, they are useful as a question reference but don't think you can simply erase the old questions and replace them with new ones. I made this mistake once when I was setting one for the first time. I forgot to ask for the TOS and instead set the paper according to an old exam paper, only to find out to my horror that the exam format had changed and I had to reset the paper all over again! Don't do the same mistake I did and always ask for a TOS!
2. Start picking at nits
Everything about the paper must be up to par. Make sure all questions are arranged neatly in line. Check that you used the correct cover page and font. Measure your diagrams to check for mathematical accuracy. You can also print out a copy of your paper to ensure your scientific diagrams can be seen clearly. ( You would be surprised how different they look from your computer screen. ) Remember to update your answer key if you change any questions. Compare your paper with an approved previous exam to see that you have written instructions correctly, or put the check boxes correctly. It is tedious work but if you find it and correct it yourself, someone else won't have to tell you so.
3. Take all criticism in your stride
After you have handed your paper up, the next stressful moment is getting it back. That's when you get it back with all the corrections you have to do by yesterday. Your head should also go over the paper with you to explain the rationale for certain corrections or to clarify her expectations. Maybe the question you thought was a killer turned out to be too easy?
It can be demoralizing the first few times to see so many corrections in a piece of work. Don't sweat it. Most of the time, your head isn't being personal when this is done. Sometimes at the HOD level, they are more aware of the different standards from level to level and they have to adjust whatever work you send in. I always get corrections in my papers and I also see colleagues more experienced than I am get back a paper with tons of corrections too. It's normal for anyone so just take it in your stride and use the experience to learn how a paper should be set.
4. Hide
I would not recommend ever setting your paper in a public setting. You might say that you need your Starbucks frappe to help you do your work, but have you considered that your students, who will be taking your exam, may be drinking at that Starbucks outlet too? Even if you go to the other side of Singapore from where your school is, you never know if you would meet a parent, school or head while you are there. Worse, they might be looking over your shoulder while you type and you might never find out until the truth blows up in everyone's faces. Order that frappe to go and hide in the privacy of your own home to do this piece of work.
Luckily I never learned this lesson the hard way, but I have encountered parents and students while marking in public areas. If I was setting papers instead, I might have gotten into trouble if one student suddenly brags on Facebook about how he really earned his marks.
Hope this short list helps some of you out there. It is not meant to be a gospel of exam setting and I'm pretty sure there are points I might not have thought of or situations that haven't happened to me [yet]. Share with us if you have any other pointers for others!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)